b'MISSISSIPPI GULF COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGEPhase #2Request for Proposals Phase #3Call for FeedbackDuring this phase, the committee wrote a Request forTaking the top proposals from the RFP process Proposals (RFP) for the QEP and invited all stakeholdersaccording to the rubric score, the committee gathered to submit a proposal.The RFP included a rubricqualitative and quantitative feedback during Phase (Appendix D) by which the proposals would be gradedThree: Call for Feedback.The committee presented and required that submissions support Strategica PowerPoint presentation on the top six proposals Plan 2020 (2011).The top ten topics from Phase(Appendix F) and held listening sessions at every I (Table 2) were included in the RFP as suggestedcampusandcenterandwithCareer-Technical topics for the proposals, but stakeholders were noteducation advisory councils to gather qualitative limited to those topics.Dr. Graham emailed the RFPfeedback.to stakeholders on September 21, 2017 (Appendix E).Committee members promoted the RFP to stakeholders in a variety of ways, such as displaying posters in high-traffic areas at each campus and center. Ultimately, stakeholders submitted twelve proposals. The committee formed a subcommittee composed of student, administrative, academic, and Career-Technical representatives charged with evaluating the proposals according to the rubric included in the RFP (Appendix D).The rubric included an item measuring whether or not the proposal contained Mission Alignment.The subcommittee scored the proposals, and the outcome is detailed in Table 3. For the quantitative feedback, the MGCCC Human Resources office distributed a survey to stakeholders Table 3 via email; in order to ensure a high response rate, RFP Submission Scores According to Rubric this survey was attached to the Intent to Return to 1 Advisement 68 Work email (Appendix G).The survey included a summary of each proposal and offered stakeholders 2 Soft Skills 65 the opportunity to choose their preferred proposal 3 Learning Communities 64 (quantitative feedback).In addition, the survey provided stakeholders with an opportunity to give 4 Critical Thinking 62 comments on each proposal (qualitative feedback). Of the 379 stakeholders who provided feedback, 199 5 New Student Orientation 62 were employees, 124 were students, and nine were 6 Competency Credit 61 community partners. The survey asked respondents to rank their first and second choices, and the results 7 Bulldog Innovation 58 are illustrated in Figure 3.8 Online Learning 49 Aftercollectingandevaluatingthisdata,the 9 Listening Skills 47 QEP Topic Selection Committee met again, and it concluded that Soft Skills for Hard Work had 10 The Three Rs 47 broad-based support of institutional constituencies. Furthermore,the topic aligned with the colleges 11 Kinesthetic Learner 40 mission and Strategic Plan 2020 (2011).Finally, this 12 Untraditional Students 38 topic also met a need indicated by the Career advisory councils and employer satisfaction surveys as will be discussed under the Development section of the QEP. 12 MGCCC QEP 2019'